Monthly Archive for January, 2007

305th Post!

Tyler Florence, bitches!All this jury blogging has got me missing the good old days of food blogging in general and hating on the organic industrial complex, specifically (and also made me forget to celebrate our 300th post by linking to something that had to do with that movie 300. Oh well).

So as it is just before lunch time, let us return for a brief moment to one of the original directives of this blog (just take a gander at our tagline, if you don’t believe me) and visit a couple food related items of interest:

First, the fine folks at Consumerist have compiled a handy chart to help you with your fast food/chain restaurant choices if you’re interested in finding out useful information about nutritional value of the various items on their menu. For example, you can find out that there are waaaaay too many calories in a Chipotle Carnitas Burrito with rice, black beans, cheese, guacamole, and salsa (but if you’ve ever had one, you’d also know that they are still waaaay too good to say no to).

They also out the restaurants like In-n-Out, Olive Garden, and Applebee’s that do not post nutritional information on their website. Apparently, “eating good in the neighborhood” either means eating ignorant or Tyler Florence’s recipes are far too secret for your pedestrian eyes.

I was surprised to learn that discounting the quality of the “meat,” the Big Mac and the Filet o’Fish, two of the best major fast food chain sandwiches ever invented, are not as bad for you as you’d think. Of course when you add a large fries, large coke, and a chocolate triple thick, you enter “the all of your daily recommended calorie alotment in one meal” territory.

If that’s not enough for you, here’s a great article from Salon (subcription required or get a Day Pass by sitting through a short commercial – talk about a value meal) about how those boxes of Annie’s mac and cheese that you no doubt stock in your pantry is actually not much different from the stuff sold in Kraft’s ubiquitious blue box.

Annie, as it turns out, is not only a health conscious, farm-living hippie, yoga-doing, mom and cottage industry entreprenuer, but also a marketing genius who is “protecting” you and your children’s mind-body well being through the evil arts of repackaging and labeling.

Okay, so Annie’s cuts a few of Kraft’s chemicals, which is a good thing, but “totally natural”? Come now. We all know that that doesn’t hold a whole lot of water in food labeling. By labeling standards, poop could be considered “all natural.” It doesn’t mean I want to eat it.

And check out the website, with its faux homebrew web design stylings – the informal font treatment, wonky callout boxes, and clipart style graphics – certainly don’t call to mind a $34 million a year product line.

The author, Anastacia Marx de Salcedo, further sharpens her aim on the entire convenience food industry and the busy parents who unwittingly support it by choosing branded boxed food:

Annie’s Homegrown out-bads McDonald’s and Coca-Cola because it plants a corporate beachhead right there in your family’s kitchen. Every time you reach for the rabbit, you’re delivering the message that the almighty brand trumps Mom or Dad’s efforts any day of the week. So, stand up, please, and receive a heartfelt thank-you from the American food industry. Where would they be without the culinary passivity and anesthetized palate you are so assiduously cultivating in the next generation? (emph. mine)

Word. There ain’t no Annie’s in our pantry.

jury duty photoblogging

One day last week, while waiting for court to get started, I took three pictures with my cell camera. This series represents the justice system: shadow/light; innocence/guilt; barriers/jails.

I’m just joshing…

Shadows

Lights

Barriers (wall and ceiling)

juror’s notebook, day 1

Jury duty is over and I was finally able to remove my Office Depot Steno Notebook from the premises. Over the next few days, I will be transcribing my unedited notes from the trial and at the end you can decide whether or not our defendant was innocent or guilty.

A little background on the case which is not covered in my notes: This was a drunk driving case where the defendant was stopped on a routine traffic stop that started when the arresting officer noticed that the defendant was not wearing a seat belt. The defendant saw the officer and quickly grabbed the seat belt to put it on. The officer followed the defendant for six blocks before pulling him over and began his investigation.

Open – Plantiff:

8:00 pm – seat belt less, pulled over – six blocks later

Defense lawyer during V.D. asked about whether or not we knew the difference between real life and stuff we see on “Court TV,” “Cops” (he even sang a bar of “Bad Boys”), and “CSI.” I wonder if it’s because these guys – a public defender and assistant city attorney – are not like the TV lawyers on “Shark.” This is not L.A. Law.

Haha – Voir Dire has V.D.

The City Attorney’s pink shirt and pink polka dot tie is a nice ensemble.

Two Separate Charges:
1) Driving under the influence
2) Driving with a Blood Alcohol Level of 0.08 or higher

Defense has no open.

Prosecution witness #1: The Arresting Officer.

The bailiff looks like Hines Ward.

Officer has made over 3,000 DUI arrests in his 17 year career.

Officer smelled a strong odor of alcohol. Asked if defendant had been drinking. “Just Had a beer.” Officer investigated further because defendant had bloodshot eyes and a droopy face.

A ‘droopy face’? The Defendant naturally has a droopy face.

Gave him the field sobriety test:

1) The Horizontal Gaze Nystagmus Test, where your eyeball jerks while following a stimulus and jerks involuntarily. Officer saw nystagmus present.

2) Walk and Turn Test, defendant did it slowly and lethargically. Instructed to walk 9 steps but walked 12.

3) One Leg Stand: stood on one leg for 9 seconds. Couldn’t stand on other leg at all.

4) Finger to nose test. Perfect but performed it deliberately and lethargically.

5) Romberg Test which instructs the subject stand with eyes closed and measure 30 seconds in their head. The defendant could not comprehend what was asked of him.

Based on the field tests, officer arrested defendant and took him to the station where he administered the breathalyzer. On a first blow, defendant blew .18 and on a second, he blew .19.

Damn.

Cross Examination:

The public defender, though in a cheap suit, has a more polished presentation. He aligns to what I imagine a lawyer to be like. Based on the movies.

During the officer’s six block tail, defendant exhibited not signs of drunk driving.

Defense attorney’s voice is nuts. It’s like a Russian/Boston Mobster voice.

Re: Strong odor. Officer could tell it was beer. AH-HAH! Ethyl Alcohol has not odor. But beer does, bitches.

AH-HAH! But what if it was Near Beer? According to the defense attorney “neah beah” smells just like regular beer.

Seriously, is this case going to hinge on the defendant’s face being droopy?

OH NO HE DIDN’T. The defense attorney just presented the notion of “wind waves” caused by the passing traffic which would have made the defendant wobbly on the walk the line test. I busted out laughing and I had to bury my face into my notebook.

The Defense attorney’s “er’s” become “ah’s” but not in a true Boston accent. It’s very weird. His accent and mannerisms are sort of…he’s Christopher Walken!!! Without the pauses, panache, or song and dance.

Boy, the defense lawyer is REACHING.

This shit is crazy. This isn’t real court – it’s Kangaroo Court in here.

No, it’s Kids Court. Where’s Ricky Tokyo, the courtroom illustrator?

In addition to the droopy face, this case is going to come down to a battle between the pronunciation of nystagmus. Is it pronounced, “NYEstagMUS” like normal folk or “nahSTHAGmus” like the defense attorney would like us to believe.

nahSTHAGmus is, according to the defense attorney, “the involuntary oscillation – (looks to us) that is “jerking” – of the eyeball.” What an ass.

All of the field sobriety tests are subjective.

Huh. The defense attorney is sort of winning me over. Not only is he giving the defendant his Constitutional right to a defense, he’s giving a hard fought one. He’s swinging for the fences (and missing) but at least he’s swinging. He’s kind of like Rocky and we’re sort of like the Politbureau in Rocky IV. Brotha’s got like 30 more minutes of grilling.

More tomorrow…
We can’t take these home?

more van dammage on a dance floor

What you are about to see has something to do with Jean Claude Van Damme proving that dancing is the vertical expression of a horizontal desire. For more accurate commentary, go to Defamer.

I love those chemical washed jeans and shades.

Hong Kong Express to hell

The Los Angeles Metropolitan Court is located in a no man’s land, though nomad’s land might be more accurate. I might have bitched about it before as a wasteland but it really doesn’t pose a problem except when the lunch hour arrives.

On orientation day, the Big, Mean, Female Public Employee tag team broke down our options for lunch and they were shitty and craptastic. Within walking distance, we could find Subway, McDonald’s, Burger King, Los Angeles Trade Tech College’s Cafeteria, a dodgy Chinese restaurant, and a place called The Barkley.

For the first two days, I followed my chef’s instincts and went to The Barkley, which specializes in American pub fare – burgers, sandwiches, salads. The burger and rueben I had were perfectly acceptable, if not great, lunch experiences.

So today, on my third day, I decided to switch it up a bit and check out Hong Kong Express, the dodgy Chinese place. Having eaten dodgy Chinese food through my college years at The Fortune Cooky and Chan’s Chinese Kitchen #3, the world heavyweight champion and the number one contender of dodgy Chinese restaurants, I was fully aware and prepared for the food that was coming: egg rolls filled only with cabbage and wrapped in thick wonton skin, black pepper beef, fried rice, and fried shrimp (hey, what do you want? I’m Chinese and I gotta commune with the peeps. I wanna know why the Whities go to places like that).

I ordered a 3 item combo plate (you know what I’m talking about) with Chow mein, beef and brocolli, orange chicken, and chicken wings.

I sat down, said a prayer, and took a bite of the overbreaded orange chicken.

And almost immediately, I felt that crazy reflux, choking, need to vomit feeling coming on. I tried to squelch it down but it wasn’t going to happen.

After considering my nearest escape routes, my first thought was: this is a dodgy Chinese restaurant. There ain’t no bathroom in this place.

Second thought: I’m going to be “that guy” who vomits in a restaurant and everybody is going to think its Ebola.

Third thought: I feel guilty because if I vomit in my food, I bet the owner will feel really bad because he will think it was the food.

Fourth thought: That piece of orange chicken wasn’t worth vomiting over. All I tasted was breading.

That’s when the vomit started coming up. I looked behind me and saw – a bathroom! I ran in, refluxing as I got to the toilet.

And I threw up.

And again.

And again.

All sticky, viscous, bile.

And it just wouldn’t stop.

I was standing there in that crappy, unkempt, stinky bathroom, with grime on the walls, bent over a toilet with specks of “dirt” around the rim , a nasty urinal to my right, and a dirty mop behind me and I thought to myself:

Johnny Hong Kong, this is the place all Chinese people come to die. There are no angels singing, no light, no feeling of peace, just a warm choking feeling in a shitty bathroom in a shitty Chinese restaurant.

I love my improperly closing flap between my esophagus and stomach.
Alas, I survived. I cleaned up, went back to my table, and then promptly ran back in to vomit again.

I came back. I ate all of my bland, greasy food, and went back to the courthouse to get my judge on. All in a day’s work for JHK.

the runaway jury

Apparently, it is I who can’t handle the truth or speak it, as the case may be, since I have found my way onto the jury.  I did not cause a mistrial as I promised, though I meant to.  I had my chance though and in my  moment, as all eyes fell onto little old me to cause a scene, I demurred.  More on this later.

Whatever.  I don’t think they had enough preemps left to get rid of me.  I left my live blog in the courtroom.  I guess I couldn’t post it even if I brought it home.   It would be against the rules.

All things shining

If you happen to be at work or stuck in a jury assembly room and need to kill about three hours in your day, someone took the time to post The Thin Red Line on YouTube in 17 10-minute parts.  You can get your war and poetry on starting with part one here.

It’s certainly not something you want to watch on YouTube’s tiny screen.  Don’t get me wrong, YouTube is perfect for Dick in a Box and Hard Gay, but for John Toll’s  magic hour photography, it leaves a little something to be desired.
Back to voir dire.




Farm Bill
can a grassroots movement seed a new economy? FriendsOfSlowMoney.com